A look at University of Illinois administrator resignations

26 Aug 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

Another Top Official at the University of Illinois Resigning.

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. (AP) – The resignation of the top administrator at the University of Illinois’ flagship campus is following a familiar script: Step down under pressure, take a year off with pay, then return as one of the highest-paid members of the faculty.

Hillary Clinton, the former secretary of state and front-runner for the 2016 Democratic presidential nomination, is embroiled in a controversy over her use of a private e-mail server to carry out State Department business while she headed the department from 2009 to 2013.URBANA — With the top two campus administrative posts once again vacant, University of Illinois officials are preparing for another round of high-level searches.Among other factors, the use of personal email accounts that skirted public records was followed by the resignations of two University officials — Provost Ilesanmi Adesida and former Chancellor Phyllis Wise.

According to this Washington Post story, her e-mails were not marked as “classified” at the time but some of them contain information now considered classified, according to the intelligence community’s inspector general. The university’s email disclosure on Aug. 7 included exchanges involving Wise and Adesida strategizing to win approval for a new medical school on the campus, which they did earlier this year. “I recognize that current controversies are causing distraction to the administration and the student body, and I do not want to contribute to those distractions,” Adesida wrote in a letter of resignation to interim Chancellor Barbara Wilson. The UI hopes to name a new chancellor to succeed Phyllis Wise during the spring semester, which could be anytime between January and May, university spokesman Jan Dennis said Tuesday. The proposed code would require all SEC members to disclose the University administrators they discuss University business with and what that business is. Five have or are expected to return after a year’s paid leave to high-paying campus jobs that wouldn’t otherwise exist, while a sixth who announced his resignation this week will rejoin the faculty at the end of the month.

While some SEC members, such as Vice Chair Kim Graber and member Matt Wheeler, raised concerns that the code would put restrictions on whom individual members can talk to about University matters, Aminmansour stated this was not the intention. The soft, lucrative landings into positions that often come with salaries of $200,000 a year or more are guaranteed by contracts commonly given to high-level administrators at many schools.

It wasn’t immediately clear what this year’s salary would have been. “I am deeply grateful to Ade for his dedicated service in many critical positions at Illinois over the last 28 years,” Killeen said in an emailed news release. By using her personal email account, and not releasing the emails, Wise “evaded her obligations under the Illinois Freedom of Information Act, as well as document retention policies and practices applicable to university email accounts and servers,” the motion says. Even if restrictions were a side-effect of the new policies, it would be a beneficial change to current rules and would provide more transparency and honesty to University communication.

Adesida, who publicly and enthusiastically endorsed the Carle-Illinois College of Medicine, was included in the more than 1,100 pages of emails released by the University that were previously withheld to skirt FOIA requests. Salaita’s lawyers noted that, in a September 2014 email, Wise wrote from her personal account that another university administrator “has warned me and others not to use email since we are now in litigation phase. I am even being careful with this email address and deleting after sending.” “By concealing and destroying communications regarding Professor Salaita’s firing, university officials have deprived the public of the full — and true — story of their misconduct,” said Salaita attorney Maria LaHood, deputy legal director of the Center for Constitutional Rights. “To truly come clean, the university must not only release all relevant records, but rectify all of its wrongs, including reinstating Salaita to his tenured position.” Campus spokeswoman Robin Kaler said UI attorneys received copies of the motions late Tuesday and are still in the process of reviewing and responding to them.

It would provide SEC members with the sense of security that they can trust fellow members; members may also be better able to understand a person’s viewpoints if more information is shared. The systematic manner of communicating outside the university email system apparently was aimed at getting around open records law and shielding those conversations from public view. She closed with “This place is so messed up.” “I agree, this place is messed up,” Adesida replied. “In my opinion, the University does not need for a President. … Well, we better get ready for the rain to fall. Explaining their decision, the two administrators said “external issues” and “current controversies” were distracting the campus from more important work.

Most importantly, it would reassure the University community that our University and its leaders are committed to transparency and shared governance rather than politics. Campus senate leaders began planning for the succession on Monday, reviewing the search committee procedures used for the last chancellor’s search in 2010-11. The email disclosures show he was involved in discussions of another matter that led to an ongoing lawsuit, the decision to rescind an offer to Steven Salaita to become a professor. The senate created a 15-member search committee chaired by a professor to advise the president — with eight faculty members, three students, one dean or unit director, one academic professional employee and one staff member. The University is currently at a major crossroads, where it can either recommit to its mission to “transform lives and serve society by educating, creating knowledge and putting knowledge to work on a large scale and with excellence” or continue on with the skepticism and distrust of the past ten years.

According to InsideHigherEd, the e-mails were related to some big university controversies in the last few years, including how some administrators and faculty decided to block the hiring of a professor named Steven Salaita, who sued the university. Here’s what happened, according to Inside Higher Ed: The outlines of the Salaita case have been clear for a year — he was offered a tenured job in the American Indian Studies program at Urbana-Champaign, and the hire was sufficiently far along that he had quit his previous job (at Virginia Tech) and been assigned classes to teach at Illinois for fall 2014.

Simply disclosing more information about conversations concerning University business will help diffuse tension and reestablish a sense of trust and dedication in every University community and administrative branch. But Wise intervened at the last minute and said that she would not forward the Salaita appointment to the board for approval, and that he didn’t have a job.

She did so after publicity over Salaita’s Twitter feed, where he wrote passionately about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in ways that struck many supporters of Israel as uncivil and hostile to Israel and supporters of that nation. The senate has yet to receive a formal request for a search committee from President Timothy Killeen, but Dennis said it should be delivered by this week. For administrators, returning to the faculty means they teach – though their class loads vary and can include semesters off – conduct research and, in some cases, take on other duties.

The provost, who also is vice chancellor for academic affairs, reports directly to the chancellor and works in areas of budget planning and management, strategic planning and more. The inquiry was conducted by the Office of University Counsel and the Office of University Ethics and Compliance, with assistance from independent external legal counsel Jones Day. This should fulfill the specific incomplete FOIA requests, and the additional emails around those three subjects are being released in the interest of transparency and disclosure.

Senior administrative officials of the University will be required to confirm their compliance with FOIA on an annual basis, and will be expected to communicate to faculty and staff the expectation of compliance with FOIA. The FOIA office will continue to be available for group training sessions upon request; the University’s FOIA website (https://www.uillinois.edu/foia) has been updated to include a link to an FAQ posted on the Attorney General’s website. University officials will review and consider “best practices” in regard to records retention and revise the University’s records retention policy as necessary.

Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

About this site