Arizona court bans abortions based on race and sex: Do reproductive decisions …

23 Dec 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

Arizona court bans abortions based on race and sex: Do reproductive decisions discriminate?.

The National Asian Pacific American Women’s Forum and an Arizona chapter of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) brought a suit against the Arizona law passed in 2011, the Associated Press reported. A woman’s husband or parents may file a civil suit “on behalf of the unborn child to bring appropriate relief,” but a woman cannot be charged criminally or civilly for having the abortion. The law states the legislation is based on “evidence show[ing] that minorities are targeted for abortion” and sex-selective abortion occurs in the United States and refers to such abortions as “discrimination.” The groups bringing the suit wrote in the case that the law itself is race-neutral, but the legislative debate leading to the law’s passage invoked false stereotypes that black women abort pregnancies at a higher rate out of racism. “On its face, it doesn’t look discriminatory, but when you look at the debates the Legislature had [while discussing it in 2011], it’s clear that it’s ugly … and based on racist and discriminatory [premises],” Dan Pochoda, a lawyer that the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which provided legal counsel on the case, told the Pheonix New Times.

Since the NAACP and ACLU admitted no woman had been denied medical care or was likely to, judges said they could not claim the law’s offensive purpose was hurting anyone. The judges said a woman denied an abortion because of the law or a doctor charged with a felony for performing an abortion would have the right to sue, Howard Fischer Capitol Media Services reported. “No one should be discriminated against by being subjected to an abortion because they are going to be born the ‘wrong’ gender or the ‘wrong’ race,” he told the Arizona Republic. The law is “disingenuous” because it purports to stop discrimination while hurting the very women it should serve by limiting their reproductive options and abortion access, Dorothy Roberts, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School who researches issues of bioethics and race, told The Christian Science Monitor. “It seems to prohibit discrimination on the basis of race and gender, but in fact it would be regulating women’s decision-making on the basis of race and gender,” she says. Roberts says she opposes discrimination that pressures women against having children of certain races, genders, and even disabilities in which “certain women’s reproductive decisions are valued more than others and certain children are valued more than others,” but she also opposes laws that restrict women’s access to abortion.

Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

About this site