Arizona sheriff faces new round of contempt hearings

25 Sep 2015 | Author: | No comments yet »

Arizona Sheriff Could Face Fines for Disobeying Judge.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s immigration crackdowns have turned him into a national figure. PHOENIX – A new round of contempt-of-court hearings began Thursday against the sheriff in the nation’s sixth-largest city over his defiance of a judge’s order to stop carrying out his signature immigration patrols.Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona – famous for his racial profiling and notorious immigration patrols, will take the stand again for contempt of court, after failing to halt his practices. The sheriff has acknowledged violating court orders by conducting immigration patrols for 18 months after he was ordered to stop, failing to turn over traffic-stop recordings before the 2012 racial profiling trial, and bungling a plan to gather videos once they were publicly revealed. Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Chief Deputy Jerry Sheridan was the first to be called to the witness stand and spent the morning denying that he remembered hearing about orders he and Arpaio have admittedly violated.

Other subjects to be examined include allegations the sheriff launched an investigation of the judge in the profiling case in a failed bid to get him disqualified and that Arpaio’s officers pocketed identification and other personal items seized from people during traffic stops and safe-house busts. It took the court five months, following heated discussions over evidence and other delays, before it was decided the hearings would resume for another round on September 24 in a US District Court. The six-term sheriff learns in court hearings set to begin Thursday whether he’ll face civil fines for disobeying a judge’s orders in a racial profiling case and whether he’ll later be called into criminal court on the same grounds. Plaintiffs’ line of questioning centered on one of the three allegations of contempt: that sheriff’s deputies continued illegal-immigration enforcement for a year and a half after a federal judge ordered they halt the practice.

Cecillia Wang, attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union’s Immigrants’ Rights Project, asked Sheridan if he recalled receiving various e-mails and attending several meetings that took place after December 2011, in which the preliminary injunction was discussed. District Judge Murray Snow, who concluded more than two years ago that the police agency had systematically racially profiled Latinos in regular traffic and immigration patrols. Chief Deputy Sheridan said he was consumed by other issues in the department at the time, including a death in its jail, effort to address bungled sex crime investigations, and a Justice Department civil rights investigation. The judge has repeatedly expressed his frustration at the agency’s failure to abide by his decision or carry out adequate investigations into officer wrongdoing. She noted that the court order in question was discussed in emails sent to him and during a Maricopa County Board of Supervisors meeting attended by Sheridan. “I am not a lawyer,” Sheridan said. “I knew there was an issue with the case.

Murray Snow issued a preliminary injunction that barred the agency from detaining an individual solely on suspicion of illegal-immigration status and without suspicion of committing a state crime. The judge also could later expose Arpaio to possible jail time and even more fines if he recommends that prosecutors press a criminal contempt case against him. The trial was predicted to only last for four days, which would see the court look into the non-disclosure of evidence in the original (2012) profiling case, as well as Arpaio’s immigration patrols and the failure of his officers to carry out the judge’s earlier request to gather on-duty recordings from fellow officers in a quiet and effective manner. The costs include legal fees for lawyers on both sides, buying cameras for hundreds of deputies and paying for a team of former police officials to monitor Arpaio’s office. Wang also focused on 40 internal affairs investigations launched after evidence bags, illegal drugs, and a large collection of IDs were found in the home of then-Deputy Charley Armendariz, who implicated other officers in wrongdoing, quit his job and killed himself in May 2014.

Toward the end of the morning, Wang shifted her focus onto the office’s internal investigations, which recently have come under fire by plaintiffs’ attorneys in the case. The taxpayer bill is expected to continue to rise until the sheriff’s office has been found to be in full compliance with the court-ordered changes for three straight years. County officials say they don’t believe Arpaio has ever had to personally pay any legal costs to defend himself in lawsuits related to his work as sheriff.

Twitter-news
Our partners
Follow us
Contact us
Our contacts

About this site