Technology

Nubia Z70S Ultra Smartphone Review: Lots of high-end features with an unusual retro camera look

The Nubia Z70S Ultra combines a retro classic design style for the cameras with modern technology. The workmanship is high-quality, but the artificial leather on the back looks rather plain. Practical controls such as a slide switch and a two-stage camera button underline the focus on photography. The Z70S Ultra is also protected against water and dust in accordance with IP68/IP69 standards.

The camera features are impressive. The large OmniVision sensor with optical image stabilization delivers good photos even in low light. The quality of the ultra-wide angle and zoom lenses is decent as well, and videos can be recorded at up to 8K resolution. The under-display front camera remains inconspicuous, but the image quality is only mediocre.

The software is based on Android 15 with three years of updates, although Nubia remains vague about its update policy. The Z70S Ultra is powered by the Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC, which ensures high performance.

The smartphone runs smoothly in everyday use, but performance decreases under continuous load due to high heat emissions that are also noticeable on the surface of the smartphone. Features such as wireless charging and eSIM support are not available.

Pros

+ bright, uninterrupted display

+ fast charging and large battery

+ IP68 / IP69 certified

+ good triple camera

Cons

can get very hot under load

no eSIM

no wireless charging

short update period

Amazon Logo

$10.99

Anbzsign [2+2 Pack for ZTE nubia Z70 Ultra / Z70S Ultra Privacy Screen Protector Full Coveray and Camera Lens Protector, Support Fingerprint Unlock Screen Protector Anti-Spy 9H Hardness

  • $9.99

    MOOISVS [2 Pack for ZTE nubia Z70 Ultra/ Z70S Ultra Privacy Tempered Glass Screen Protector, Ultra HD Tempered Glass Film, Anti-Spy, 9H Hardness, Anti-Scratch, Bubble Free

  • $8.99

    Anbzsign [2 Pack for ZTE nubia Z70 Ultra / Z70S Ultra Screen Protector, Soft TPU Screen Protector (Not Glass) HD Clarity Flexible TPU Film Friendly Anti-Scratch Bubble Free

The Nubia Z70S Ultra is a slightly improved refresh to the Z70 Ultra. The Z70S Ultra not only offers a new design but also a significantly larger battery. 

The sensor of the main camera is now bigger at 1/1.13″ compared to the 1/1.56″ one in the original Z70 Ultra, with improved image stabilization.

Display

6.85 inch 19.89:9, 2688 x 1216 pixel 431 PPI, Capacitve Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 Hz

Storage

256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB 

, 229.14 GB free

Connections

1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: Gravitiy, Proximity, Compass, Gyroscope , OTG, IR-Blaster, X Linear Resonant Actuator

Networking

802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), 5G-Sub6 (Band 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPS

Size

height x width x depth (in mm): 8.6 x 164.3 x 77.1 ( = 0.34 x 6.47 x 3.04 in)

Battery

6600 mAh Lithium-Ion, Silicon-Carbon-Anode

Charging

fast charging / Quickcharge

Operating System

Android 15

Camera

Primary Camera: 50 MPix (35 mm, 1/1.3″, 1.2 µm, f/1.7, OIS, OV50H) + 50 MPix (Ultra Wide / Macro, 1/2.88″, f/2.0, 122 °, AF, OV50D) + 64 MPix (2x opt. Tele, 70 mm, f/2.48, AF, OIS, OV64B); Camera2-API-Level: Level 3
Secondary Camera: 16 MPix

Additional features

Speakers: Dual, Keyboard: Onscreen, Case, USB-Cabel, SIM-Tool, Nebula AIOS 1.5, 12 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, Opus, LC3, LHDC, LDAC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L2, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1I, B1C, B2a, B2b), Galileo (E1, E5a, E5b) | HDR: HLG, HDR10 | DRM Widevine L1 | IP68 / IP69 | Body-SAR: – W/kg, Head-SAR: – W/kg | max. charging speed: 80 W (wired), fanless, waterproof

Weight

228 g ( = 8.04 oz / 0.5 pounds) ( = 0 oz / 0 pounds)

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

The Nubia Z70S Ultra sports a retro design that is reminiscent of classic cameras. The black model in particular, in combination with the optional camera kit, is strongly reminiscent of a certain German photography specialist. 

The workmanship of the smartphone is pleasing. The artificial leather look on the back feels a bit cheap but is pleasant to touch due to the surface texture.

The slide switch opens the camera by default with a choice of three settings — GameSpace, voice recorder, and table lamp, though the slider can also be used as a classic mute switch. There is a dedicated two-stage camera button on the opposite side.

The smartphone is both waterproof and dustproof in accordance with IP68 and IP69 standards.

The Nubia Z70S Ultra offers modern Wi-Fi 7 with tri-band connectivity, meaning it can also use a 6 GHz WLAN. The transfer rates in combination with our Asus ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 reference router are both fast and stable.

The Z70S Ultra also supports all current mobile communication standards, including 5G sub-6 with a wide range of frequencies. Dual nano-SIM is on board, but there is no eSIM option. The telephony features are good when held to the ear, but noise suppression reaches its limits early on in noisy environments.

For biometric security, an optical fingerprint sensor is integrated under the display, which has good recognition rates and quickly unlocks the Z70S Ultra. Additionally, or alternatively, facial recognition can be used via the front camera, although this is unreliable in dark environments. The linear vibration motor, on the other hand, impresses with its crisp feedback.

Networking
Nubia Z70S Ultra
802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1009 (min: 1000) MBit/s ∼92%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





972 (min: 952) MBit/s ∼83%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1554 (min: 1436) MBit/s ∼82%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1862 (min: 1808) MBit/s ∼100%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





965 (min: 943) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





915 (min: 852) MBit/s ∼78%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1852 (min: 911) MBit/s ∼98%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1864 (min: 1828) MBit/s ∼100%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





1094 (min: 655) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





1154 (min: 1048) MBit/s ∼99%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1311 (min: 984) MBit/s ∼70%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1204 (min: 1187) MBit/s ∼65%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Wi-Fi 7
iperf3 transmit AXE11000





981 (min: 886) MBit/s ∼90%

iperf3 receive AXE11000





829 (min: 758) MBit/s ∼71%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz





1884 (min: 928) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz





1569 (min: 1486) MBit/s ∼84%

Average 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






966 (min: 595) MBit/s ∼88%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






1167 (min: 810) MBit/s ∼100%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1283 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼68%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1441 (min: 719) MBit/s ∼77%

Average of class Smartphone
 
iperf3 transmit AXE11000






726 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼66%

iperf3 receive AXE11000






732 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼63%

iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz






1387 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼74%

iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz






1392 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%

0501001502002503003504004505005506006507007508008509009501000105011001150120012501300135014001450150015501600165017001750180018501900Tooltip

Nubia Z70S Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1554 (1436-1697)

Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1853 (928-1907)

Nubia Z70S Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1855 (1808-1894)

Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1567 (1486-1593)

Nubia Z70S Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1009 (1000-1017)

Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø981 (886-1008)

Nubia Z70S Ultra 802.11 a/​b/​g/​n/​ac/​ax/​be; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø965 (952-984)

Honor Magic7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø828 (758-853)

Nubia does not provide any information on the sustainability aspects of the Z70S Ultra. The smartphone comes in a thick, well-filled box with lots of plastic and is shrink-wrapped.

Updates for the Z70S Ultra will be available for three years. Nubia has not provided any information on whether this applies to the major OS updates as well.

Selfie with the Nubia Z70S Ultra
Selfie

The front camera is located under the display (UDC: Under Display Camera) and is barely recognizable. Unfortunately, the pictures taken with it are blurred and look over-sharpened. Videos are recorded in full HD 30 fps at best and look slightly overexposed and washed out.

The highlight is on the back with three high-resolution sensors. The main sensor now comes from OmniVision but is larger than its predecessor. The new optical image stabilization (OIS) does a visibly better job, but lags for a brief moment during fast video pans.

Photo quality is really good, and decent pictures can still be taken even in low light. The zoom remains usable beyond the optical range. The ultra-wide-angle lens does not produce any aberrations but becomes visibly more pixelated at the edges.

Videos can be recorded at up to 8k 30 fps resolution or in 4k at up to 120 fps. Image stabilization is available up to 4k 60 fps.

Image Comparison

Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.

Main CameraMain CameraUltra-wide5x ZoomLow light

orginal image

click to load images

ColorChecker

9.5 ∆E

8.4 ∆E

10.9 ∆E

10.6 ∆E

10.4 ∆E

8.2 ∆E

7.5 ∆E

11.6 ∆E

9 ∆E

4.8 ∆E

6.9 ∆E

5.2 ∆E

9.5 ∆E

12.2 ∆E

10.6 ∆E

3.2 ∆E

10 ∆E

15 ∆E

6.3 ∆E

3.5 ∆E

8.1 ∆E

7.9 ∆E

2.1 ∆E

3.6 ∆E

ColorChecker Nubia Z70S Ultra: 8.12 ∆E min: 2.09 – max: 14.99 ∆E
ColorChecker

26.3 ∆E

45.5 ∆E

35 ∆E

31.7 ∆E

38.6 ∆E

52.9 ∆E

42.8 ∆E

28 ∆E

32.5 ∆E

24.9 ∆E

55 ∆E

54.5 ∆E

25 ∆E

41 ∆E

28.1 ∆E

63.5 ∆E

34.8 ∆E

37.2 ∆E

58.6 ∆E

61.2 ∆E

47.1 ∆E

34.8 ∆E

23.3 ∆E

12.9 ∆E

ColorChecker Nubia Z70S Ultra: 38.96 ∆E min: 12.89 – max: 63.47 ∆E
Subpixel matrix
Subpixel matrix

The Nubia Z70S Ultra’s 6.9-inch AMOLED display is practically identical to that of its predecessor. However, it is not an LTPO panel, which means that the 144 Hz refresh rate can be reduced to 60 Hz at best.

The brightness is 1,393 cd/m² on an average in a pure white display with the ambient light sensor activated. With a reduced white area, we measured up to 1,869 cd/m² in HDR mode. A maximum luminance of 644 cd/m² is available for those who adjust the brightness manually.

The OLED flickers at a constant 60 Hz and shows a homogeneous amplitude curve. We also observed high-frequency PWM dimming, which is supposed to work at up to 2,160 Hz. A slightly higher frequency was measured at minimum brightness.

Complaints are unlikely due to the flickering but cannot be completely ruled out either.

1366
cd/m²
1380
cd/m²
1450
cd/m²
1360
cd/m²
1388
cd/m²
1452
cd/m²
1349
cd/m²
1371
cd/m²
1419
cd/m²

Distribution of brightness

tested with X-Rite i1Pro 3

Maximum: 1452 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1392.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.63 cd/m²
Brightness Distribution: 93 %
Center on Battery: 1388 cd/m²
Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.84
ΔE Greyscale 3.6 | 0.09-98 Ø5.1
95.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)
Gamma: 2.19

Nubia Z70S Ultra
AMOLED, 2688×1216, 6.9″
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
OLED, 2992×1344, 6.8″
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Dynamic AMOLED 2X, 3120×1440, 6.7″
Honor Magic7 Pro
OLED, 2800×1280, 6.8″
Screen

53%

3%

34%

Brightness middle

1388

2148

55%

1371

-1%

1607

16%

Brightness

1393

2050

47%

1370

-2%

1609

16%

Brightness Distribution

93

86

-8%

96

3%

95

2%

Black Level *
Colorchecker dE 2000 *

2

0.5

75%

2.7

-35%

0.9

55%

Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *

4.6

1.4

70%

4.2

9%

1.8

61%

Greyscale dE 2000 *

3.6

0.8

78%

2

44%

1.7

53%

Gamma

2.19 100%

2.23 99%

2.03 108%

2.24 98%

CCT

6318 103%

6582 99%

6450 101%

6346 102%

* … smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession – a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected 60 Hz
Amplitude: 14.85 %
Secondary Frequency: 2173 Hz

The display backlight flickers at 60 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .

The frequency of 60 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8363 (minimum: 5 – maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Measurement series with fixed zoom level and different brightness settings (The amplitude curve at minimum brightness looks flat, but this is due to the scaling. The info box shows the enlarged version of the amplitude at minimum brightness)

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

       Response Time Black to White
0.94 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.4735 ms rise
↘ 0.4705 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 2 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
1.12 ms … rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined ↗ 0.4925 ms rise
↘ 0.6305 ms fall
The screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 3 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).

With the Snapdragon 8 Elite SoC and 12 GB of RAM, the Nubia Z70S Ultra has one of the most powerful SoCs on board at the time of testing. The system’s performance gives no cause for criticism in everyday use, but the GPU and browser benchmarks show that the Z70S Ultra falls short of expectations.

This could be due to poor thermal management, as the smartphone gets extremely hot in the stress tests. We measure surface temperatures of just under 54 °C in places, even though the SoC throttles down considerably at times. At least no condensation forms behind the camera lens this time.

The speakers of the Nubia smartphone deliver decent output, but sound somewhat hollow at high volumes.

The 6,600 mAh battery promises long battery life. In the practical WLAN test with display brightness adjusted to 150 nits, the Z70S Ultra achieves a very good result. However, given the size of the battery, we feel it could have delivered even longer run times.

Geekbench 6.4
Single-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


3136 Points +6%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


3050 Points +3%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (2309 – 3228, n=19)





3024 Points +2%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


2952 Points

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


1950 Points -34%

Average of class Smartphone
  (196 – 3479, n=214, last 2 years)





1577 Points -47%

Multi-Core
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


10029 Points +12%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (7784 – 10401, n=19)





9194 Points +3%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


9019 Points +1%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


8952 Points

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


4741 Points -47%

Average of class Smartphone
  (830 – 10401, n=214, last 2 years)





4528 Points -49%

PCMark for Android – Work 3.0
Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


22935 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (14862 – 27169, n=17)





21148 Points -8%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


20673 Points -10%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


20630 Points -10%

Average of class Smartphone
  (4507 – 27169, n=200, last 2 years)





14154 Points -38%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


13235 Points -42%

3DMark
Wild Life Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


26616 Points +6%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


25194 Points

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


23837 Points -5%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (19436 – 25847, n=16)





23731 Points -6%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


9452 Points -62%

Average of class Smartphone
  (271 – 27493, n=197, last 2 years)





9269 Points -63%

Wild Life Extreme
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


7029 Points +11%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


6330 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (5230 – 7094, n=17)





6151 Points -3%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


5800 Points -8%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


2548 Points -60%

Average of class Smartphone
  (61 – 7094, n=202, last 2 years)





2506 Points -60%

Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


6885 Points +8%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


6387 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (4852 – 7212, n=17)





6110 Points -4%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


5933 Points -7%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


2605 Points -59%

Average of class Smartphone
  (62 – 7212, n=201, last 2 years)





2493 Points -61%

Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


12747 Points +11%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


11490 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8405 – 13318, n=17)





10868 Points -5%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


10634 Points -7%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2799 – 13318, n=82, last 2 years)





7960 Points -31%

Solar Bay Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


12400 Points +10%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


11257 Points

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (8386 – 13244, n=17)





10749 Points -5%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


10066 Points -11%

Average of class Smartphone
  (3223 – 13244, n=82, last 2 years)





7887 Points -30%

GFXBench
on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (50 – 166, n=17)





96.7 fps +61%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


70 fps +17%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


60 fps

Average of class Smartphone
  (5.5 – 166, n=209, last 2 years)





54.7 fps -9%

1920×1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


286 fps +47%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


257 fps +32%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (171 – 321, n=17)





254 fps +31%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


194 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


118 fps -39%

Average of class Smartphone
  (3.4 – 321, n=209, last 2 years)





100.8 fps -48%

on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


120 fps +100%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


102 fps +70%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (45 – 144, n=17)





85.8 fps +43%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


60 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


45 fps -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.85 – 144, n=210, last 2 years)





43.3 fps -28%

2560×1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


107 fps +81%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (59 – 118, n=17)





96.9 fps +64%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


90 fps +53%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


59 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


44 fps -25%

Average of class Smartphone
  (1.2 – 129, n=209, last 2 years)





39.7 fps -33%

3840×2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


52 fps +63%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (32 – 53, n=17)





45.2 fps +41%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


44 fps +38%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


32 fps

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


20 fps -37%

Average of class Smartphone
  (0.54 – 53, n=210, last 2 years)





18.4 fps -42%

Octane V2 – Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


98817 Points +288%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


89248 Points +251%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (25448 – 95506, n=16)





73504 Points +189%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384


61885 Points +143%

Average of class Smartphone
  (2228 – 100368, n=213, last 2 years)





43669 Points +72%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


25448 Points

Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


700 Points +175%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


669 Points +162%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (255 – 738, n=14)





495 Points +94%

Average of class Smartphone
  (51 – 1501, n=53, last 2 years)





469 Points +84%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


255 Points

Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (51 – 9453, n=53, last 2 years)





1133 Points +420%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


697 Points +220%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


663 Points +204%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (218 – 734, n=14)





481 Points +121%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


218 Points

Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2
Average of class Smartphone
  (123 – 13084, n=53, last 2 years)





1842 Points +232%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


1567 Points +182%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


1560 Points +181%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (555 – 1708, n=14)





1101 Points +98%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


555 Points

Jetstream 2 – 2.0 Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy, Adreno 830, 12288


334.386 Points +345%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


284.674 Points +279%

Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
  (75.1 – 289, n=14)





211 Points +181%

Average of class Smartphone
  (13.8 – 387, n=165, last 2 years)





139.2 Points +85%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, Adreno 830, 12288


75.098 Points

  52.8 °C
127 F
53.7 °C
129 F
51.6 °C
125 F
 
  53.4 °C
128 F
52.9 °C
127 F
49.3 °C
121 F
 
  52.4 °C
126 F
53.2 °C
128 F
45.4 °C
114 F
 
Maximum: 53.7 °C = 129 F
Average: 51.6 °C = 125 F
46.6 °C
116 F
48 °C
118 F
48.4 °C
119 F
44.7 °C
112 F
49.2 °C
121 F
49 °C
120 F
43.2 °C
110 F
47.4 °C
117 F
48.9 °C
120 F
Maximum: 49.2 °C = 121 F
Average: 47.3 °C = 117 F

Room Temperature 22 °C = 72 F | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 51.6 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 32.8 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 53.7 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 35.1 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 63.7 °C for the class Smartphone.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.5 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 32.8 °C / 91 F.

3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test Stability
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


69.5 % +73%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


57.6 % +43%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


53.4 % +33%

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


40.2 %

Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability
Nubia Z70S Ultra
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


82.5 %

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash


82.1 % 0%

Honor Magic7 Pro
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


68.4 % -17%

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash


66.5 % -19%

0102030405060708090100110120130Tooltip

Nubia Z70S Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø118.8 (55.7-138.6)

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø46.3 (36.8-52.9)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø84.2 (71.3-133.4)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø96 (74.7-129.7)

Nubia Z70S Ultra Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø16.3 (15.2-18.4)

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.49 (6.32-7.69)

Samsung Galaxy S25+ Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite f. Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12 (10.9-16.3)

Honor Magic7 Pro Adreno 830, SD 8 Elite, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø12.4 (11.3-16.6)

dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2040.8342530.128.83126.724.34027.825.95035.932.26328.322.78028.823.710027.321.612517.230.616016.35020014.753.325012.852.831513.257.140012.657.350012.367.263012.271.880012.169100012.372.3125012.376.9160012.175.620001278.9250012.27931501375.8400013.175.3500013.170.4630013.565800013.4661000013.472.81250013.567.91600013.360.2SPL2586.9N0.665.5median 13.1median 67.9Delta1.77.938.437.830.633.919.23521.534.336.939.124.43319.739.715.840.914.144.615.255.612.455.29.560.19.762.310.563.49669.869.38.974.49.477.211.580.911.278.11281.611.780.71279.61282.112.580.312.977.313.371.413.567.713.568.413.664.123.990.90.584median 12median 71.41.59.6hearing rangehide median Pink Noise

Battery Runtime

WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 137) 21h 15min

While the Nubia Z70S Ultra is a powerful smartphone with an unusual retro look, good camera setup, and long battery life, compromises have to be made when it comes to updates and heat emissions.

Nubia Z70S Ultra
– 06/23/2025 v8

Daniel Schmidt

Connectivity

54 / 69 → 78%

Games Performance

31 / 55 → 57%

Application Performance

77 / 85 → 91%

Smartphone – Weighted Average

CO2 Emissions
No Data

Materials
0%

Packaging
0%

Power Use
96.5%

Repairability
40%

Software Updates
39%

Recycle Logo Total Sustainability Score: 29.3%

Image

Model / Review

Price

Weight

Drive

Display

1.

82.5%

Nubia Z70S Ultra

Nubia Z70S Ultra
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $10.99
Anbzsign [2+2 Pack for ZTE n…
2. $9.99
MOOISVS [2 Pack for ZTE nubi…
3. $8.99
Anbzsign [2 Pack for ZTE nub…
List Price: 769€
228 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.85″
2688×1216
431 PPI
AMOLED

2.

86%

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL

Google Pixel 9 Pro XL
Google Tensor G4 ⎘
ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘
16 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $1,099.00
Google Pixel 9 Pro XL – Unlo…
2. $7.99
Supershieldz (3 Pack) Design…
3. $9.99
OMOTON 3+2 Pack for Google P…
List Price: 1299€
221 g 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash 6.80″
2992×1344
482 PPI
OLED

3.

88.4%

Samsung Galaxy S25+

Samsung Galaxy S25+
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 256 GB 
Amazon:
1. $16.99
Super Fast Charger Type C, 2…
2. $19.99
S25 S24 S23 S22 Ultra Samsun…
3. $7.98
firtstnow 3 Pack Glass Scree…
List Price: 1149 Euro
190 g 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.70″
3120×1440
513 PPI
Dynamic AMOLED 2X

4.

89.2%

Honor Magic7 Pro

Honor Magic7 Pro
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite ⎘
Qualcomm Adreno 830 ⎘
12 GB Memory, 512 GB 
Amazon:
1. $11.99
Ibywind Screen Protector For…
2. $8.99
MOOISVS 2+2Pack for Honor Ma…
3. $8.99
MOOISVS 2+2 Pack for Honor M…
List Price: 1300€
223 g 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash 6.80″
2800×1280
453 PPI
OLED

More articles related to this device

Nubia Z70S Ultra (Z70 Series)

Related Articles

Transparency

The selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.

This is how Notebookcheck is testing

Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.

Daniel Schmidt, 2025-06-26 (Update: 2025-06-26)

Related Articles

Back to top button