Here’s why OLED isn’t always the right laptop choice

Dell XPS 13 2024 front view showing display and keyboard.
Mark Coppock / Digital Trends

I love OLED displays. They’ve been growing in popularity, from a rarity just a few years ago to the point where many laptops — premium and midrange — at least offer an OLED option. The technology has brilliant colors and inky blacks, making them perfect for creators and media consumers.

But choosing an OLED laptop does have its drawbacks. They can burn more power, especially when they often come in higher resolutions, and they cost more. If you don’t absolutely need OLED’s colors and contrast, then you can save money on a laptop that might last a long longer on a charge. Let’s dig into the pros and cons.

The cost factor

Depending on the manufacturer, upgrading to OLED can be pricey. As I look at the Dell XPS 14, for example, I see that moving from the Full HD+ (1920 x 1200) IPS panel to the 3.2K (3200 x 2000) OLED option costs $300. The same is true for the XPS 16. Choosing the OLED panel on the XPS 13 requires upgrading to 32GB of RAM as well, for a $500 difference. With the HP Envy x360 14, going from the FHD+ IPS display to the 2.8K (2880 x 1800) OLED panel costs a more reasonable $150. The Lenovo Yoga Pro 9i costs $257 more for 3.2K OLED compared to 3.2K IPS.

Some laptops only come with OLED displays and they cost more than competing laptops with IPS displays. While some bargains exist with OLED technology, such as the Asus Zenbook 14 Q425 that can be had for under $1,000, it’s safe to assume that you’re paying a premium for all that goodness. Of course, exceptions exist, such as the first two Microsoft Copilot+ laptops we’ve reviewed, the HP OmniBook X and the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x. Those two are within $60 of each other, but the Yoga has an excellent OLED display that’s a lot better than the OmniBook’s IPS display.

OLED is better, but does it matter?

The Galaxy Book4 Ultra open on a wooden suruface.
Luke Larsen / Digital Trends

When you compare OLED’s image quality to an IPS display side by side, you’re going to see the difference. The colors will be brighter and more accurate, the blacks will be awesome, and performance when watching high dynamic range (HDR) content will be so much better. And if you’re a creator or avid media consumer, then those things will matter.

But what if you use your laptop just for productivity tasks like web browsing, email, and office apps? In that case, maybe you don’t need the best colors or contrast and you’re not all that worried about sharpness. In that case, a lower-res IPS display can be more than good enough.

Here are some results comparing very good IPS displays with very good OLED displays. Each IPS display listed here has contrast that’s not as good as OLED, but still excellent, along with reasonably good colors (the MacBook Air M3 has colors close enough to OLED for most people) and more than enough brightness. The OLED displays are better, but they might not offer that much of an advantage.

Contrast sRGB AdobeRGB DCI-P3 Accuracy DeltaE
(lower is better)
Dell XPS 14
532 1,930:1 100% 72% 72% 1.09
Dell XPS 14
374 15,930:1 100% 85% 100% 0.50
Dell XPS 13
507 2,060:1 100% 76% 76% 1.15
Dell XPS 13
482 16,500:1 100% 95% 100% 0.92
LG Gram 16 2-in-1
489 27,810:1 100% 96% 100% 0.85
HP OmniBook X
325 1,400:1 100% 78% 79% 0.98
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
489 16,980:1 100% 96% 100% 0.67
Apple MacBook Air M3
495 1,480:1 100% 87% 100% 1.24

What about battery life?

The elephant in the room when making a decision between OLED and IPS is battery life. Generally, we assume that laptops with OLED displays will see shorter battery life not only because the technology can burn more power when displaying bright images and scenes (and theoretically less with dark images and scenes), but also because they’re usually higher resolution and often have faster refresh rates.

The challenge is that in evaluating that question, it’s not often that we have identical systems to test. We recently did, though, and so we were able to put our hypothesis to the test by evaluating two Dell XPS models with identical configurations other than their displays. That means they had the same chipsets, RAM, storage, and battery capacities, differing only in their display technologies.

Specifically, we looked at the Dell XPS 13 and Dell XPS 14 with their IPS and OLED options. To reiterate, the XPS 13 offers a choice between FHD+ IPS or 2.8K OLED while the XPS 14 offers FHD+ IPS or 3K OLED.

We also looked at the HP OmniBook X with a 14-inch IPS 2.2K display and the Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x with a 14.5-inch 3K OLED panel. Both use the same efficient Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite chipset, but the HP has a 54 watt-hour battery and the Lenovo has a 70 watt-hour battery. The OmniBook X lasts significantly longer on a charge, especially when viewing video. That means that in choosing between these two otherwise similar laptops, you’re making the same kind of decision regarding battery life.

Web Video
Dell XPS 13
14 hours, 6 minutes N/A
Dell XPS 13
(OLED, 2.8K)
7 hours, 17 minutes 8 hours, 7 minutes
Dell XPS 14
8 hours, 16 minutes 10 hours, 10 minutes
Dell XPS 14
(OLED, 3.2K)
11 hours, 49 minutes 14 hours, 53 minutes
HP OmniBook X
(IPS )
13 hours, 37 minutes 22 hours, 4 minutes
Lenovo Yoga Slim 7x
(SnapDragon X Elite X1E-78-100)
12 hours, 5 minutes 17 hours, 3 minutes

I’m a fan of OLED, but you might not be

I watch a ton of HDR content on my devices, and my iPad Pro 13 M4 with its incredibly bright tandem OLED display is the best of everything I’ve tried so far. I also like a ton of brightness and sharpness because I’m staring at black text on white backgrounds for hours each day. So I would always opt for the more expensive option. I haven’t even mentioned my previous favorite, the mini-LED display on my MacBook Pro 16 that had the best HDR performance before the new iPad Pro came along.

But if none of that applies to you, then you might be able to save some serious money. You can also get significantly better battery life by opting for IPS. And there’s nothing wrong with that.

Mark Coppock

Mark has been a geek since MS-DOS gave way to Windows and the PalmPilot was a thing. He’s translated his love for…

They raised $50 million for charity with dusty consoles. Here’s how

A speedrunner playing a game at Awesome Games Done Quick.

$50 million. That’s an unimaginable amount of money, but in the 14 years that Games Done Quick (GDQ) has been holding speedrunning marathons, that’s how much money it’s raised for charity. It’s sure to be outdated by the time you’re reading this article, too — at the time of publishing, Summer Games Done Quick (SGDQ) 2024 in Minneapolis is entering its final push for donations, which will certainly add to the $50 million milestone.

Despite such a monumental total sum, GDQ says its median donation is just $25. It’s millions of people, from eager fans to devoted volunteers and tight-knit staff, that make the biannual marathon stream happen. It certainly doesn’t happen on its own. Twice a year, GDQ holds an event that runs for seven days, 24 hours per day, which is not only shown to a live audience in the thousands but also streamed live on Twitch for millions more.

Read more

Here’s how Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o stack up in a direct comparison

The Anthropic logo on a red background.

In the ever-growing large language model (LLMs) landscape, two front-runners stand out from the rest of the race: Anthropic’s Claude 3.5 Sonnet and OpenAI’s GPT-4o (the “o” stands for “Omni”). Both AIs boast impressive capabilities, but which reigns supreme? This guide dives deep into Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, dissecting their strengths and weaknesses across various tasks.

We’ll not only explore their relative accuracy and response speeds, but also unpack their pricing structures and service tiers. By the end of this article, you’ll be armed with the knowledge to make an informed decision about which LLM best suits your specific needs and budget.
Pricing and tiers
ChatGPT users can access the GPT-4o model for free, but the number of queries you’re allowed to ask it within a three-hour span is limited. Exceeding that limit will move you down to using GPT-3.5, OpenAI’s older, less capable model, until the cooldown timer has reset.

Read more

The best home internet providers of 2024

AT&T Internet Air gateway on table.

You can’t always pick from a wide range of home internet providers (depending on your location), but even if your choice is limited, you still want to select the right one. From pricing to speed, support, and contract plans, picking the right broadband provider can make a real difference to the service you receive. Here are our favorites.

Interested in grabbing a short-term internet deal with a discount and bundled extras? Here are the best ones available now.
AT&T Fiber

Read more

Related Articles

Back to top button